Which case established a constitutional right to privacy in marital contraception?

Which case established a constitutional right to privacy in marital contraception?

• A. Roe v. Wade
• B. Griswold v. Connecticut
• C. Eisenstadt v. Baird
• D. Planned Parenthood v. Casey

Answer: (B)

Griswold v. Connecticut clarifies that there is a constitutional protection of privacy in intimate marital decisions about contraception. The Court struck down a law banning the use of birth control by married couples, saying that the Constitution protects a zone of privacy surrounding the decision to use contraception in a marriage. This privacy idea isn’t spelled out word-for-word in the text, but the Justices traced it to the broader liberties guaranteed by the First, Third, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments—the notion that certain personal decisions lie within the protected realm of liberty. This is the best answer because it directly addresses contraception within marriage. The other cases expand privacy in related directions but not this specific context: Eisenstadt v. Baird extends privacy protections to individuals regardless of marital status; Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey focus on abortion rights, which rely on privacy principles but concern a different reproductive issue.

Griswold v. Connecticut clarifies that there is a constitutional protection of privacy in intimate marital decisions about contraception. The Court struck down a law banning the use of birth control by married couples, saying that the Constitution protects a zone of privacy surrounding the decision to use contraception in a marriage. This privacy idea isn’t spelled out word-for-word in the text, but the Justices traced it to the broader liberties guaranteed by the First, Third, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments—the notion that certain personal decisions lie within the protected realm of liberty.

This is the best answer because it directly addresses contraception within marriage. The other cases expand privacy in related directions but not this specific context: Eisenstadt v. Baird extends privacy protections to individuals regardless of marital status; Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey focus on abortion rights, which rely on privacy principles but concern a different reproductive issue.